“When the Lord saw the widow, his heart went out to
her . . . . ” Luke 7:13-14
The Reverend Luther Zeigler
Emmanuel Church
June 9, 2013
Emmanuel Church
June 9, 2013
Commencement at Harvard is
always an exciting time of year, and as one of the University’s chaplains, I
have the privilege of participating in the full complement of these end-of-the-year
festivities. It is an emotionally
complex time: on the one hand, there is
great joy over degrees obtained and prizes won; a sense of satisfaction, accomplishment,
and pride. But on the other hand, there
is an impending sense of loss and pain, as students realize that a wonderful
chapter of their lives is coming to a close and that many of the relationships
that have sustained them these past several years on campus will be changed forever
as everyone moves on with their lives.
There is also a sense of anxiety about the future, particularly these
days, when the economy is so uncertain and the world seems so full of risk.
Part of my role as chaplain
is, of course, to be a companion to my students as they sort through these
feelings. It is not that I have any
answers for them. I have no better sense
of the future than they do. But I do
have the ability to be a compassionate listener and to share with them my deep
conviction, my faith, that, whatever the future holds, they will not be alone,
as God will accompany them on their journeys, wherever they may lead.
Chaplains are not the only
ones who seek to provide comfort and guidance to students at this time of
year. There are also Commencement
speakers. And Harvard’s Commencement
Week is, for better and for worse, full of such speeches. For the most part, they are forgettable,
riddled with platitudes and shopworn bits of advice. This year, as you no doubt heard, there was a
fair amount of hoopla because Oprah Winfrey was the keynote Commencement
speaker. Oprah did a fine job, but truth
be told, her remarks were overshadowed by those of two lesser known
speakers: the first was the
Baccalaureate address given by Harvard President Drew Faust and the second was
the Graduate Student Address given by master’s student Jon Murad.
Faust’s words to the
graduating seniors harkened back to the events of that dreadful Monday when the
bombs went off near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, a day that will forever
mark these graduates’ college memories just as 9/11 marked their childhoods. Faust’s
focus, though, was not on the violence or the terror or their complex social causes,
but rather on the profound existential questions such crises provoke and how we
respond to them. Moments like these, she
observed, force us to confront life’s bigger questions: “What matters most to us? Who are we? What do
we owe to one another? How should we live?”
Faust went on: “As I heard and watched and read reports of
the bombings, I, like others, was struck by the way the actions of so many at
the scene represented a powerful answer to such questions. Amid the calamity, there appeared streams of
people running toward the chaos,
toward the explosions. The first responders — police, firefighters, the
National Guard; the raft of doctors, nurses, and EMTs; the trauma surgeon who
had just completed the Marathon and ‘rushed in’ by heading straight to the
operating room at MGH. The volunteers, the bystanders — women, men, young and
old — running toward the unknown, risking their own safety to see if they could
help.”
“There was the priest who saw
blood, put on his brown Franciscan robe, and made his way into the mayhem; the
cardiologist, a volunteer from Texas who thought, ‘OK, so I am about to die,’
and took off his belt to apply as a tourniquet to a victim’s leg even while
policemen shouted at him to evacuate; the Army veteran who ‘saw smoke … smelled
cordite,’ and ran down the stairs from a post-race party, anticipating more
bombs. He saved a college student’s life with a tourniquet made from a T-shirt
and reunited a mother and child. The man
in the cowboy hat, who ripped away fencing to reach the most severely injured,
and later said simply, ‘My first reaction was to run toward the people.’”
What is so remarkable about
these responses, Faust commented, is not primarily the courage they reveal, but
perhaps even more importantly, the underlying “spark of fellow-feeling” that animates the
decision to run toward the hurt. Her
advice to the Class of 2013 was that they cultivate this “spark of
fellow-feeling” and commit themselves to leading lives of running toward: “lives motivated, even seized, by something
larger than themselves, lives of engagement and commitment and, yes, risk —
risk taken in service to the world’s needs and to what matters most.”
Faust’s comments were
underscored – indeed, they were embodied – in the graduate student commencement
address given by Jon Murad. Murad
received that day his master’s degree in public administration from the Kennedy
School, and was himself a 1995 graduate of Harvard College. What is unusual about Murad is that,
notwithstanding his two Harvard degrees, he is a New York City cop. Although he has many other opportunities open
to him, he has decided to devote his career to being a cop in New York because
keeping the world safe for people in one of the world’s great cities really
matters and is a job deserving of smart, capable people like him.
Murad’s address was
charmingly entitled “In Praise of Clip-on Ties,” in celebration of the uncool,
and almost comical, neckwear New York City’s finest are required to wear. In his remarks, Murad urged his fellow
graduates to free themselves of all the stereotypes regarding fitting careers
for Harvard graduates. The measure of a
person is not his or her salary or title or rank, he insisted. Harvard graduates don’t have to end up as
investment bankers or big firm lawyers or even fancy college professors at Ivy
League schools. Success is not about
rising to the top, Murad said, but about reaching out to change the world for
the better. Meaning is found in running
toward the chaos of life, not in seeking to rise above it.
As I was praying over our
gospel text this week, in the hopes of cobbling together a sermon, these two
addresses kept rattling around in my head.
Until I realized that Faust’s advice and Murad’s challenge were in fact
both echoes of the deep truth embedded in today’s gospel lesson. Upon first hearing, it is easy to categorize
the story of the widow from Nain as just another miracle story, a testament to
Jesus’ divinity, proof that he is indeed God’s son.
But the heart of the story is
not its ending – the resurrection of the widow’s son. Rather, the key to the story comes before
that, in Jesus’ initial response to this woman in mourning, this woman who has lost
not only her husband, but now her only son.
Overcome with grief, she feels as if she has lost everything and that
her life is over.
And it is precisely into this
woman’s deep pain that Jesus steps in verse 13.
The NRSV translation that we heard is the somewhat colorless “and the
Lord had compassion for her.” But this
is one of those places where the language actually matters. The underlying Greek word is not the usual
one for compassion, but rather the more literal: “and the Lord’s heart went out to her.” His heart went out to her.
It would have been easy for
Jesus to pass the woman by, to go about his business. He had no obligation to her. But Jesus is ever attentive to those in
pain. And it doesn’t matter to him
whether they are family or friends, Jews or Gentiles, prominent folk or poor
widows, believers or not. Jesus notices
those who hurt; and his heart goes out to them.
In such circumstances, it would have been so tempting, so human, to look
the other way, to move away from the hurt, out of fear or a sense of inadequacy
or of not wanting to get involved. How
many times have you and I done just that?
But Jesus always moves toward the hurt.
And it is not just Jesus’
heart that moves toward the widow. His hand
does as well: he reaches out to touch
the bier (the platform) upon which the widow’s dead son lies. Never mind the strict Jewish laws forbidding
touching such things. Jesus moves toward
the source of the widow’s pain, and with his touch, he brings life where before
there was only death, hope where before there was only despair.
There is in these two short
verses an important double movement:
first, compassionate attentiveness to those in distress; and second, a physical
move toward them to provide care, comfort, and healing.
We see this very same
pattern, of course, in our Old Testament lesson: the story of Elijah and the widow of Zarephath. As soon as Elijah hears about the widow’s
dying son, he cries out in compassionate prayer, and then he moves toward the
son, literally throwing himself on the boy’s pain.
These two stories, in short,
offer us a simple, but profoundly important insight into Christian living. Following Christ means organizing our lives,
as we can, around this same double movement:
compassionate attentiveness to those in distress, whomever they are and
wherever they are, and a willingness to run toward their pain, to offer
whatever care we can.
Such compassionate living
needn’t be heroic. It can be as simple
as visiting a friend in a nursing home; or helping a blind man across the
street; or volunteering to cook for those who are hungry; or donating those
clothes you really no longer need to those who do need them. But while such acts needn’t be heroic, they
do need to become a consistent part of who we are if we are to respond
faithfully to Christ’s call.
Not being God or one of his
prophets, we cannot guarantee that our compassionate attentiveness and faithful
caregiving will always yield miraculous results. But we are assured by Jesus’ example that God’s
deep desire for each of us is to be drawn into such Christ-like lives of
compassionate engagement, with the world’s and with each other’s pains. President Faust may call it embracing a life
of running towards. Jon Murad may call it taking the risk of
putting on a clip-on tie to serve others.
Jesus puts it more simply: follow
me.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment